Cases 71 - 80 of 829,112
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Gray #14672-040 v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Joseph S. Gray #14672-040
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Winn Trust Mortgage, Barrington Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Boone v. Lowell Area Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Boone
Defendant:
Lowell Area Schools, Nate Fowler, Dan VanderMeulen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donthnier v. Honor Credit Union
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Valeri Donthnier
Defendant:
Honor Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Ramsey v. Tuolumne County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Rafe Dearl Ramsey
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Sheriff's Office and Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MORRIS MOSS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
DEMANZIO LAMONT MORRIS MOSS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and Town of South Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01115
Petitioner:
William Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak v. Sullivan
as 3:2024cv05428
Plaintiff:
Save the Davis-Meeker Garry Oak
Defendant:
Debbie Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 703 Migratory Bird Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
