Cases 41 - 50 of 827,676
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk41141
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hicklin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Mondale Leon Hicklin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greg & Company, LLC. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv04214
Plaintiff:
Greg & Company, LLC.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
S. K.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Linfo IP, LLC v. Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc.
as 3:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
