Cases 1 - 10 of 831,895
(PC) Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office et al
as 3:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office, S. Huss, A. Coudillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Allen & Lulu LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02441
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Allen & Lulu LLC d/b/a Black Jack's Bar & Grill and d/b/a Blackjack's Bar & Grill and Melody S. Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MTD Investments, Inc. v. Jantan et al
as 2:2024cv05518
Plaintiff:
MTD Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Abdul Mukti Bin Jantan and Aidah Binti Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Rogne v. City of Catoosa
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
John Rogne
Defendant:
City of Catoosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
JEFFRIES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
BRIGITTA JEFFRIES
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CROSS v. SHERIFF et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ELIAS JACOB CROSS
Defendant:
SHERIFF and A. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
