Cases 101 - 110 of 831,389
Alto Dynamics, LLC v. Fresha.com SV Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Alto Dynamics, LLC
Defendant:
Fresha.com SV Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mahdi v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Abuwi Mahdi
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
McCray v. Township of Eatonville Florida et al
as 6:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Adrienne D McCray
Defendant:
Broderick Lampkin, Township of Eatonville Florida and Stanley Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Funk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough)
as 8:2024cv01518
Petitioner:
Jason Matthew Funk
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conaway v. Vanelswyk
as 8:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine R. Conaway
Defendant:
Brice Vanelswyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Step et al
as 7:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
David J. Hughes
Defendant:
Sgt. Step, Corp. Lester and C/O / Corp Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Merron v. Cavagnaro
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Merron
Defendant:
Josie M. Cavagnaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
VOSS et al v. SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
REBECCA VOSS and THOMAS VOSS
Defendant:
SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC and JUSTIN HASKIN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
