Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Rose Duru v. President Trump Administration
as 19-2134
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Marietta, Georgia, H&R BLOCK BAILEY'S CROSSROADS CENTER, DAVID R. CLOUSTON, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
United Supreme Council, 33 Deg v. United Supreme Council
as 19-1942
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH SLAUGHTER, UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ANCIENT ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE FOR THE 33 DEGREE OF FREEMASONRY, PRINCE HALL AFFILIATED, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation, MICHAEL A. PARRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL, 33 DEGREE OF THE ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE OF FREEMASONRY, PRINCE HALL AFFILIATION, SOUTHERN JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a Tennessee Non-Profit Corporation and UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL 33 (THIRTY-THREE) OF THE ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE OF FREEMASONRY (PRINCE HALL AFFILIATION) SOUTHERN JURISDICTION U.S., GRAND ORIENT AT WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation; T
Defendant:
ROGER C. BROWN, Individually and as Grand Master of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Virginia Free and Accepted Masons, Incorporated and MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF VIRGINIA FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS, INCORPORATED
Duru v. President Trump Administration et al
as 1:2019cv00874
Defendant:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Nathalia Cibolti, Randall A. Constantine and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, STEPHEN PORTER, GARY BECKMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP, CHIMES D.C. INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, THE CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INCORPORATED and others
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1122
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, CHIMES INTERNATIONAL, LTD., MARTIN LAMPNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP and JEFFREY RAMSEY
Phil Kerpen v. Metropolitan Washington
as 17-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHIL KERPEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, AUSTIN RUSE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CATHY RUSE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY, ANTHONY FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Intervenor/Defendant:
KARL ANTHONY RACINE
Intervenor:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 3:2015cv02575
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Pharmerica Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv01312
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California, State of Colorado and others
Defendant:
Pharmerica Corp. , Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Jackson v. Tripp et al
as 3:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Reginald Allen Jackson
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, United States Corporation Company, Superior Court of the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
