Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Calloway et al
as 4:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Anton Bell, R. J. Bruner, S. N. Salang and others
Plaintiff:
Anita M. McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe-2 v. Richland County School District 2 et al
as 3:2020cv02274
Defendant:
Sheriff Leon Lott, Richland County School District 2, Captain John E. Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Jividen et al
as 2:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Donald Slack, Captain Brian Pinick, Timothy Forren and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Mabry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Doe v. Richland County School District 2 et al
as 3:2018cv02731
Defendant:
John E. Ewing, Richland County School District 2, Jamel Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Mother Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EWING-BEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. EWING-BEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, HAROLD BROCK, MARK HIGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
