Cases 31 - 40 of 173
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2021cv02247
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Waccamaw Mental Health, Kathy Ward, Donno Lupo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2021cv00591
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrovia v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv00989
Defendant:
Administrative Lieut N Zahn, Baltimore County Police Dept., Warden Gail Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Petrovia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
The United States Constitution, Hampton City Police Dept., Hampton City Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Keyon L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Henrico County Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Henrico County Jail and Henrico County Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Barry Thomas Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eads v. Wood County Police Dept. K9 Unit
as 3:2020cv00219
Defendant:
Wood County Police Dept. K9 Unit
Plaintiff:
William C. Eads, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Baltimore City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2020cv03008
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Baltimore City Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Carl Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Turpin v. Shellingberger et al
as 1:2020cv02516
Defendant:
John Doe (2), Fruitland Police Dept., Heather Shellingberger and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin De'Andre Turpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. City of Ravenswood et al
as 2:2020cv00533
Defendant:
City of Ravenswood and Ravenswood City Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Cody Trevor Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Deacon et al
as 1:2020cv00685
Defendant:
Franklin Police Dept., T. Deacon, City of Franklin, VA and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel M. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
