Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
G.T.L., Msp. Trooper D, Sgt. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hutchinson v. United States, The et al
as 3:2023cv06178
Plaintiff:
George Baldwin Hutchinson, Jr. and G. Baldwin
Defendant:
United States, The, 81st Readiness Division Ft Jackson SC, Provost Marshal FT Jackson/Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Harold v. Lauren et al
as 7:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Harold
Defendant:
Lauren and Sheriff Brian Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Asmer v. Ms. Walton-Battle
as 23-6443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY ASMER
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. WALTON-BATTLE, H. LOPEZ and WALTER VEREEN
Defendant:
REX BLOCKER, STEPHEN SIZEMORE, KRISTEN ELDRED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ij Federal Question Injunction and Declaratory Relief
Hutchinson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00528
Petitioner:
Miguel Marquis Hutchinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Timothy McNeal v. J. Hutchinson
as 22-7319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY MCNEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
J. HUTCHINSON, Acting Warden, C. NEVILS, MR. GLENN and others
Croxton v. Autry et al
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Debra Knight Croxton
Defendant:
Mike Autry, Teresa Lawson, William Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McNeal v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2021cv03431
Plaintiff:
Timothy McNeal
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, Mr. C. Nevils, Mr. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
