Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Mr. Brown, Kyle Rosch, Officer Clark and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroman v. Clark
as 1:2023cv02993
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Terry Stroman
Defendant:
Officer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clark et al
as 5:2023hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Officer Clark and DHO Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doyle v. Draper et al
as 7:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Blane Doyle
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Draper, 1st Lt. Law, Capt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claybrooks v. Valentine et al
as 7:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Graylin E. Claybrooks
Defendant:
Sheriff Lane A. Perry, Officer Valentine, Officer Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Kunz et al
as 6:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Dale Martin, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Clark Addison Kunz, Fountain Inn Police Department SC, the and City of Fountain Inn SC, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skinner v. Clark et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Officer Cushfield, Officer Cantrell, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Micklos et al
as 5:2013ct03293
Plaintiff:
Tory Edwards
Defendant:
Dr. Micklos, Lt. Elken, Captain Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Dean v. Southwest Virginia Regional
as 13-7084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY, MAJOR GEORGE HEMBREE and OFFICER CLARK PAULEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
