Cases 1 - 10 of 11,777
AL-BAYYINAH v. JAMES
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
JATHIYAH A. AL-BAYYINAH
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jay James Fields
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rosier v. Warden Wise et al
as 8:2024cv03373
Plaintiff:
David Rosier
Defendant:
Warden Wise, Assistant Warden Tisdale, Dustin Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karsten Allen v. T. Norvell
as 24-6541
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant:
T. NORVELL, Sergeant, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. MULLINS, Correctional Officer, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, G. V. HORNE, Lieutenant at Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Watson v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Marvin M. Watson
Defendant:
Warden, Travis Guess and S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
