Cases 91 - 100 of 458
Tanya Jones v. Megan Brennan
as 20-2190
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA JONES, a/k/a Tanya Lorraine Jones
Exum v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2020cv00574
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Carston Exum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Grant v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv03652
Plaintiff:
Omesshia Grant
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
National Urban League et al v. DeJoy et al
as 1:2020cv02391
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of the United States, Common Cause and National Urban League
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, US Postal Service, Louis DeJoy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Ron Wyden, Thomas R. Carper, Tammy Duckworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Honeycutt v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
Aaron Honeycutt
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
NLRB v. USPS
as 20-1792
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Tacitus Hall v. Timothy Anderson
as 20-1786
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SERVICING CENTER, FORD MANUFACTURER, KEITH MICHAEL YACKO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACITUS ANASTACIUS HALL, a/k/a Tazz Hall
Johnson v. United States et al
as 2:2020cv02533
Defendant:
United States, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Ramona Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Etienne v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2020cv01879
Defendant:
Lance Hindle, United States Postal Service and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Etienne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
