Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Nesbit, Jr. v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00960
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Mark Bethea and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Nesbit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guttenberg et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03411
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Howell, Holly Sanborn, Kenneth Hickman and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09837
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hatton and Lynnwod W. Hatton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen Earl v. US
as 16-1734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES VETERANS AFFAIRS, SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary of V.A., JAMES CRANDELL, VA Employee and others
Jensen v. Philips et al
as 1:2016cv01175
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cameron Jensen
Defendant:
Howard Hatton Philips and Michael A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15512
Plaintiff:
Terri S. Hatton and Donald R. Hatton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zurita Gray et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02306
Plaintiff:
Zurita Gray , Rosalyn Cotton , Patricia Delair and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hatton v. Johnson et al
as 3:2014cv00428
Plaintiff:
Adrian T. Hatton
Defendant:
Johnson and Parham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatton v. Pfizer Incorporated
as 2:2014cv00566
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hatton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatton et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08116
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hatton and Dennis Hatton
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
