Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Pace v. Macky et al
as 1:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Charles Norman Larson Pace
Defendant:
Mr. Macky, Ms. Victory and Ms. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
TAYARA v. LARSON et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA TAYARA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COBY LARSON and CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larson v. True Select LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Joyce Larson
Defendant:
True Select LLC doing business as Firstlight Home Care, Guardianlight of Northwestern VA Incorporated doing business as Firstlight Home Care and Kendra Ghanbari
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Larson v. Sims et al
as 2:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Candi Cannon, Michael Stobbe, Charline McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kristina Larson v. American Home Products
as 21-1065
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS, WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTINA MERLE LARSON
ELC TRANSPORT, INC. v. THE LARSON GROUP, INC.
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant:
THE LARSON GROUP, INC. doing business as PETERBILT OF CHARLOTTE
Plaintiff:
ELC TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv03596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Lucey v. Paucek et al
as 1:2020cv02424
Defendant:
Coretha M. Rushing, Edward S. Macias, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lacey and Thomas Lucey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Larson v. USA-2255
as 8:2020cv00319
Petitioner:
Justin Larson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
