Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Meister v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020ct03295
Defendant:
Warden D. Smith, C/M M. Swanagin, AM McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ICENY USA, LLC v. M&M's, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02418
Defendant:
Marvin Castro Mondragon, Gabriel Eugene Pico, M&M's LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ICENY USA LLC and ICENY USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cynthia Holmes v. James Becker
as 19-1572
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES Y. BECKER, Individually, M. M. CASKEY, Individually, MIKELL ROSS SCARBOROUGH, in official capacity and , as indicated, individually re: unofficial acts and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA C. HOLMES, a/k/a C. Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, M.D.
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al v. D. M. et al
as 2:2019cv00340
Defendant:
C. M., M. M. and D. M.
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. M&M Renovations, LLC
as 1:2019cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kelly Scott
Defendant:
M&M Renovations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
