Cases 11 - 20 of 23
David Montgomery v. Conmed, Inc.
as 16-1133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL MONTGOMERY
Defendant - Appellee:
CONMED, INC.
Defendant:
JASON BINGHAM, Cpl., JOHN CARHART, Sgt., SENIOR TROOPER CLAYCOMB and others
McKinnedy v. Pate et al
as 6:2013cv01793
Plaintiff:
William C McKinnedy, III
Defendant:
John R Pate, William Byars, Jr, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Montgomery v. Bigham et al
as 1:2013cv00930
Plaintiff:
David Michael Montgomery
Defendant:
Jason Bigham, John Carhart, Senior Trooper Claycomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04987
Plaintiff:
Sarah R. Jenkins and Billy Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Cannon
as 8:2012cv01169
Petitioner:
Cornelius R Jenkins, Jr
Respondent:
Al Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. JENKINS, et al
as 1:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EDITH R. JENKINS and THE BENCH TAVERN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Dettinger et al v. National Production Workers Union Severance Trust Fund
as 3:2010cv00641
Plaintiff:
Gene Dettinger , James R. Jenkins , Thor Keeley and others
Defendant:
National Production Workers Union Severance Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Jenkins v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2010cv01551
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Mark Sanford, Warden Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Frank R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rootare v. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
Paul Rootare
Defendant:
Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. and Susan R. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
