Cases 11 - 20 of 2,619
Young et al v. Star Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Amy Young and Hans Robinson
Defendant:
Star Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Young v. USA
as 3:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Lantis Jeton Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
Ruby Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastla Center-Highlands 510, South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs d/b/a Coastal Center-Highlands Hillside, Freddie Lee Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Bradby v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
David Bradby
Defendant:
Julia Blankenship and Niles Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Young v. DOWCP
as 24-1299
Petitioner:
STEVEN T. YOUNG
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nancy Ferguson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
NANCY YOUNG FERGUSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
