Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Barfield v. Neal
as 8:2020cv04019
Plaintiff:
John L Barfield and John Lawrence Barfield
Defendant:
Chris Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Meetz
as 8:2020cv02634
Plaintiff:
John L Barfield
Defendant:
Vickeery Meetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Cunningham et al
as 8:2020cv02388
Defendant:
Hope Hatchell, Eric McDaniel, Teressa Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
John L Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Hatchell et al
as 8:2020cv01987
Plaintiff:
John Lawrence Barfield and John L Barfield
Defendant:
Hope Hatchell, Sgt Chris Neal, Eric McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barfield v. USA
as 1:2020cv01841
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Barfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barfield v. Hatchell et al
as 8:2020cv01828
Defendant:
Hope Hatchell, Michael Nunn, Teressa Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
John Lawrence Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Smith et al
as 5:2019ct03193
Defendant:
Administrator Warren, Sheriff Lemme Smith and Medical Providor
Plaintiff:
George A. Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barefield v. City of Parkersburg et al
as 2:2019cv00396
Defendant:
City of Vienna, City of Williamstown, Michael A. Pifer and others
Plaintiff:
Cortez L. Barfield and Cortez L. Barefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Aris Hines and Brandi Thomason
Defendant:
Sheriff TERRY S. JOHNSON, Deputy Sheriff Randy Jones, Doe Deputies 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
MAGISTRATE S.B. BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
