Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Reams v. Correct Care Solutions
as 3:2017cv00573
Plaintiff:
Ramel Reams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Lewis et al
as 1:2017cv01555
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Cheryl Lewis, Brian Unknown, David Samson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1968
COTTON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE et al
as 1:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
DAVID-WILLIAM COTTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIDUCIARY TRUSTEE, STEPHANIE REAMS, ARCHIE L. SMITH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ream v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11367
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ream
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CSX Transportation Inc v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
as 3:2016cv03208
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Revenue and Rick Reames, III
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. South Carolina Dept of Revenue
as 16-1726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and RICK REAMES, III, Agency Director of the South Carolina Department of Revenue
US v. Kenneth Ream
as 16-4354
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LAMONT REAMS
REAMS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00510
Petitioner:
KENNETH LAMONT REAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CSX Transportation Inc v. South Carolina Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2015cv04625
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Revenue and Rick Reames, III
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
Shary Stegall et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02953
Plaintiff:
Shary Stegall , Carol Jennings , Pearl Grice Austin and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
