Cases 21 - 30 of 208
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. THE CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
THE CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Coll v. Alamia et al
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Coll
Defendant:
Hank Alamia, CO Thomas, CO Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allee v. Streeval et al
as 7:2021cv00594
Petitioner:
Justin J. Allee
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval, U.S. Attorney General and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Razo v. Streeval et al
as 7:2021cv00516
Petitioner:
Mark Razo
Respondent:
"Current" U.S. Attorney General, The Department of Justice and J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grier v. HUD et al
as 8:2021cv02165
Plaintiff:
Duandra Grier and Daundra Grier
Defendant:
HUD, Housing Authority of Elkton Maryland, Housing Authority of Dallas Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kozohorsky v. U.S. Attorney General
as 5:2021hc02183
Petitioner:
James Kozohorsky
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nelson Vasquez-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1913
Petitioner:
NELSON ALEXANDER VASQUEZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Timms v. U.S. Attorney General
as 5:2021hc02145
Petitioner:
Gerald Wayne Timms
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
