Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Sidney Harr v. State of North Carolina
as 14-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D. and others
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE PAUL TREVOR SHARP
James v. Barrett et al
as 9:2013cv03155
Plaintiff:
Zljahuc L James
Defendant:
SHU Officer Barrett and SHU Officer M Harr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2013mc00042
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC, ROSE MARKETING, LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING, LLC and others
HARR v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HARR v. SASSER et al
as 1:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HARR
Defendant:
PAUL SASSER , DAYSPRINGS FAMILY MEDICINE and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harr et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05914
Plaintiff:
Paula Harr and Jon Harr
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sidney Harr v. Richard Brodhead
as 12-1450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, Ph. D., DAVID F. LEVI and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7541
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chase v. Prior/Present DOC Commiss. et al
as 1:2011cv01156
Plaintiff:
Warren Chase
Defendant:
Prior/Present DOC Commiss., Prior/Present DPSCS Secretary, Prior/Present NBCI Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01096
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
