Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Thorne v. Bowen et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Thorne
Defendant:
Ms. Bowen, Ms. L. Smith, Mrs. Sgt. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Wayne Langston v. Birt K. Adam
as 16-1449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHNNY WAYNE LANGSTON
Defendant - Appellant:
BIRT K. ADAMS, a/k/a Ofc Bert Adams
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHIEF PAUL GARDNER
Langston v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02502
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Anchondo Langston
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Timothy Langston
as 15-4656
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY PHILLIP LANGSTON
Caiola v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02628
Plaintiff:
Michael Caiola , George Buccigrosssi , William Langston and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC , Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ballard v. Andrews et al
as 5:2015ct03088
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
C. Andrews, Lt. Connors, Officer Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2015cv00945
Petitioner:
Langston Jackson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Caiola v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Caiola , George Buccigrosssi, William Langston and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc., Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC, Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langston v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29885
Plaintiff:
Annie L. Langston
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
