Cases 31 - 40 of 250
CASE OPENED IN ERROR - Girard et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Girard, Beulah Slesser and Suzanne McLeod, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hansell B. Malone, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
August, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Zachary August, Syed Ali, Julea Seliavaski and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, D. Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. VDOC et al
as 7:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
VDOC, H.W. Clarke, R.C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Charlene Malone
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Malone v. Cates et al
as 6:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Christopher Malone
Defendant:
Pamela Denise Cates, John Doe, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Larone Elijah v. US
as 22-6277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARONE FREDERICK ELIJAH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and C. MALONE
Malone v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02022
Petitioner:
Jimmy D. Malone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
