Cases 31 - 40 of 1,003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KERSEY v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
HORACE KERSEY
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION, MR. WALSTON WADE and MR. J. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Wade, et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Veronica Newkirk and Veronica D. Newkirk
Defendant:
Christopher Wade, Trooper John Doe 1, Trooper John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long et al v. Jordan et al
as 4:2023cv05742
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade Long and Clyde Kiser
Defendant:
David Jordan, Thomas Keller and Arrigo Carotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pate v. Little et al
as 3:2023cv05656
Plaintiff:
Adam Pate
Defendant:
Sophie Little and Wade Little
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7108
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Kendrick v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7099
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Richard Kendrick v. L. Edmonds
as 23-7101
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD WADE KENDRICK
Respondent / Appellee:
L. EDMONDS, Warden
London v. Stiltner et al
as 7:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn London
Defendant:
S. Stiltner, Looney, J. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deberry v. Wade et al
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Deberry
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Justin Wade, Correctional Officers Does and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
