Cases 51 - 60 of 3,535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Robert Moore v. State of Maryland
as 24-6325
Petitioner:
ROBERT GARY MOORE
Respondent:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND and WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Dr. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles B. Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhinehardt v. Moore et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tyree Rhinehardt
Defendant:
D. F. Moore, AJ Osmer and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Spratley et al
as 6:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ian M. Moore
Defendant:
Tobias J. Spratley, Gurdev Trucking, LLC, Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Other:
Paul F. Rajinder
Cross Defendant:
Lucero Noe Ignacio Barba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Weddington v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon Scott, Gov. Wes Moore and Baltimore City, Md.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Aurel v. Alston et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Lt. Alston, India White, Warden Robert Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
