Cases 51 - 60 of 316
Salazar et al v. Fields et al
as 7:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
J C-H, Ms. Luz Huerta Salazar, Mr. Jose F Toribio and others
Defendant:
Mr. James Russell Fields, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Carrie Randa v. William Barr
as 20-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARRIE DEAN RANDA
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice
Dawkins v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2020cv00748
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice doing business as Federal Bureau of Prisons also known as Warden and Warden
Petitioner:
David Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01274
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Woodford v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00499
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Chanielle L. Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hill
as 3:2020cv00536
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Eric M Hill
Intervenor:
United States Department of Justice
Alexander v. Carvajal et al
as 8:2020cv02420
Plaintiff:
Morris Alexander
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, United States Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Jesse Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Samuel Sloan v. Maria Childress
as 20-1566
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK HERRING, SHAYAM RAMAN, WILLIAM G. PETTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL H. SLOAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
