Cases 61 - 70 of 170
General Information Services, Inc. et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv03698
Plaintiff:
General Information Services, Inc. , Dexter Group Holdings, Inc. and Neno Research, Inc.
Defendant:
George E. Smith and WEBDATX INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Rose A. Carpenter et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03398
Plaintiff:
Rose A. Carpenter , Teresa A. Blair , Denise Boucher and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv08724
Plaintiff:
Margaret R. Smith and Virgil E. Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07749
Plaintiff:
Priscilla E. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Percy Smith v. Dennis Daniel
as 16-7019
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERCY E. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DENNIS DANIELS
Smith v. USA
as 3:2016cv00381
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antonio E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH, ET AL. V. 3M COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv00379
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SMITH, JULIAN JACKSON SMITH and DOROTHY E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith v. Pair et al
as 2:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Earl Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jimmy Burnett Pair, Jr., Jack E Smith, Wardie Pernell Vincent, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02627
Plaintiff:
Laura E. Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Karl Michael Jones
Defendant:
University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus and Marcus E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
