Cases 71 - 80 of 139
United States of America v. Funds Contained in the Better Business Checking Account Numbered 802070987, et al
as 5:2014cv00476
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds Contained in the Better Business Checking Account Numbered 802070987 and The Busniess Sweep Account Numbered 802121715 at Capital Bank, Up to $359,557.25 in the name of Marla Bednar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Bracy v. Hapag-Lloyd AG et al
as 2:2014cv02728
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bracy
Defendant:
Hapag-Lloyd AG, Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC, Hapag-Lloyd America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY KANE
Defendant - Appellee:
UPS PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Lighthouse Inflatables, LLC v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
Lighthouse Inflatables, LLC
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DAZZLE UP, LLC v. LML INVESTMENTS, LLC
as 1:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
DAZZLE UP, LLC
Defendant:
LML INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Kirk v. UPS National Long Term Disability Plan
as 3:2013cv09582
Plaintiff:
Leigh E. Kirk
Defendant:
UPS National Long Term Disability Plan, Aetna Life Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
