Cases 81 - 90 of 442
Hammond v. Hudgins
as 5:2021cv00053
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Petitioner:
Willie Hammond, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gustafson et al v. Bowers
as 7:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Candice Renee Gustafson, Johnny Ray Hammonds and Earl Ray Hammonds, Jr.
Defendant:
Barbara Dunaway Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammond v. Falkena et al
as 3:2021cv00221
Defendant:
Pizza 111, LLC and Lance Falkena
Plaintiff:
Michael Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnes v. York et al
as 7:2021cv00145
Defendant:
Dr. York, Nurse Practitioner P. Hammonds and Nurse K. Harrison
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jurone Hammond v. John Wolfe
as 21-6277
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN S. WOLFE, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JURONE HAMMOND
Jamarv Hammond v. Sheriff Al Cannon
as 21-6114
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMARV PAREMORE HAMMOND
Respondent / Appellee:
SHERIFF AL CANNON
Hammond v. Pearl Auto Sales & Services Inc.
as 1:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Pearl Auto Sales & Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrae J. Hammond, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammond, Sr. v. Wabash Auto Group
as 1:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Wabash Auto Group
Plaintiff:
Andrae J. Hammond, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devon Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc.
as 20-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY G. HOSBEIN, Esquire, DENNIS M. WILEY, Magistrate, WARREN G. CLARK, District Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON ARMOND GAYLES, a/k/a Devon A. Gayles El, In propria persona, proceeding sui juris, Moorish American National All Rights Reserved Ex rel
Hammond v. Two Unknown Named Agents of the United States Marshals Service
as 4:2020cv04298
Plaintiff:
Jamarv Paremore Hammond and Jamarv P Hammond
Defendant:
Two Unknown Named Agents of the United States Marshals Service, Unknown Agent of the United States Marshal #1 and Unknown Agent of the United States Marshal #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
