Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Blake v. Keefe Commissary
as 2:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. O'Keefe et al
as 7:2010cv00539
Defendant:
Assistant Chief Ron Hall, James O'Keefe and Sgt, Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
James Alfonso Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
KATRENA FREE , BEVERLY PAYLOR , MICHELE ELOVER and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stigall v. Keefe Commissary Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00663
Plaintiff:
Coleman A. Stigall
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Inc., G. Johnson and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bea v. Robinette et al
as 7:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Marion Leon Bea
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network Sales and Ms. K. Robinette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Pipes v. Correctional Medical Services
as 10-6032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN PIPES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and others
Weaver-Keefe
as 8:2009cv02564
Plaintiff:
Patricia Weaver-Keefe and David Keefe
Defendant:
Anderson County School District Two, Thomas T Chapman, Dawn Busa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sullivan v. Szymczak et al
as 1:2009cv02488
Plaintiff:
John Sullivan
Defendant:
Allen Szymczak, Don Keefe, March Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Arehart v. Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
as 7:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Arehart
Defendant:
Keefe Commisarry Network Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
