Cases 81 - 90 of 959
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
US v. Elmer Martinez
as 23-4020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ELMER ZELAYA MARTINEZ, a/k/a Killer, a/k/a Morenito Martinez, a/k/a Perez Danillo
Sintia Perez-Lemus v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1021
Petitioner:
SINTIA ABIGAIL PEREZ-LEMUS, C.P.M.P. and S.R.M.P.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Herasma Ordonez Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1006
Petitioner:
HERASMA ORDONEZ PEREZ, ELDER MAUDIEL ESCALANTE ORDONEZ and SEIDY CONSUELO GOMEZ LUCAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Garcia v. LeFever
as 1:2022cv00590
Petitioner:
David Perez Garcia
Respondent:
Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Belmora, LLC v. Mprezas, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Defendant:
Martha Hernandez, Fernando Garces, Mprezas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Belmora, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Frank Hinton v. Ernesto Luciano-Perez
as 22-2008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK LATHAM HINTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERNESTO LUCIANO-PEREZ, M.D., COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS and INVESTIGATOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
