Cases 1 - 10 of 6,618
US v. James Davis, Jr.
as 24-7208
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES OTIS DAVIS, JR.
Davis v. Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.
as 1:2024cv02343
Plaintiff:
Marquita Davis
Defendant:
Aspire Lifestyles (Americas) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALKER v. DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TERAN WALKER
Defendant:
DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL and ATRIUM HEALTH WAKE FOREST BAPTIST CORPORATION MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv01082
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv03606
Defendant:
Chidi Oriaku, Emmanuel Esianor, Yvette Ledjo and others
Plaintiff:
Hasaan Kalonji Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BENTLEY et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
CARL KING
Defendant:
SGT. C. DAVIS, SGT. MCKINLEY, SGT. BENTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al vs. CAPE PLC et al
as 3:2024cv07252
Plaintiff:
Leah Sandford, Tracy Bowery Meyer, Julie K Allen and others
Defendant:
Altrad Services Ltd, CAPE PLC, CAPE ASBESTOS COMPANY LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv07175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis et al v. Townsend Tree Service Co., LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Defendant:
The Townsend Corporation and Townsend Tree Service Co., LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Davis and Marsha Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
