Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Hines-Bogle et al v. NationStar Mortgage LLC
as 8:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Lynne Hines-Bogle, Russell Bogle and Sarah Bogle
Defendant:
NationStar Mortgage LLC and NationStar Mortgage LLC doing business as RightPath Servicing
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Arnold v. Cregger et al
as 7:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
John David Arnold
Defendant:
Officer J.T. Cregger, Officer A. Bogle, Lieutenant George Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogle v. JD Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Bogle
Defendant:
JD Technologies, Inc. and Radiator Specialty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shipp v. Punturi et al
as 7:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Shipp
Defendant:
Warden K.T. Punturi, Lieutenant Bogle, Captain Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Cregger et al
as 7:2020cv00467
Defendant:
J. T. Cregger, G. Berry, G. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Bogle et al
as 4:2019cv02318
Defendant:
Paul M Burch, Tony Chavis and James Bogle, Sr
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Magill et al
as 5:2018cv02852
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Mental Health, Judge Paul M Burch, James G Bogle and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jorden and Charles Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Bogle et al
as 4:2018cv02256
Defendant:
James Bogle, Jr and James K Falk
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Bogle
as 9:2018cv01513
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
James Bogle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
