Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robert A Leak et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Leak, Robert Glenn Hodgson, Steve Knowles, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Donald Bagwell v. Jamie Dimon
as 16-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RICHARD BAGWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE DIMON, a/k/a James Dimon, d/b/a J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, MARIANNE A. LAKE, GRADY I. INGLE and others
Richards et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Donald Richards and Elizabeth Richards
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAGWELL v. DIMON et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD: BAGWELL
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON , MARIANNE A. LAKE , GRADY I. INGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv06281
Plaintiff:
Hazel Hill and Donald Richard Hill
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Donald Onkle v. Ray HC
as 12-7622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RICHARD ONKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY HC, Regional Director, Health Services Director or Chief of Operations for Offender Management, VARGO, Warden and KING, Doctor
Onkle v. King et al
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Onkle
Defendant:
King, Vargo and Ray HC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onkle v. King et al
as 1:2012cv00847
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Onkle
Defendant:
King, Vargo and Ray HC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onkle v. Vargo et al
as 1:2012cv00849
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Onkle
Defendant:
Vargo, King and Ray HC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Onkle v. Ray HC et al
as 1:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Onkle
Defendant:
Ray HC, Vargo and King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
