Cases 1 - 10 of 4,099
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marick et al v. Tsottles et al
as 8:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Debra Marick, Anthony Michael Marick, Aden Joseph Marick and others
Defendant:
Adam Tsottles, Envirosolutions Real Property Holdings, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kenya Teasley v. Elizabeth O'Brien
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CURRAN O'BRIEN
Shirley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Jo Shirley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
Matthew Bishop and Elizabeth Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
