Cases 1 - 10 of 102
AUGHENBAUGH v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
RAYN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH and RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT A.J. SMITH and LINDSAY GAINEY TA'KAIYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisa v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Gainey Lisa
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
AUGHENBAUGH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Respondent:
ADAM SMITH and TA'KAIYA GAINEY-LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Gainey v. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Dupree Gainey
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Wood Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gainey v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03007
Plaintiff:
Rodney Bryron Gainey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GAINEY v. USA
as 1:2022cv00774
Petitioner:
TAHARA NICOLE GAINEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gainey v. Florence One Schools District et al
as 4:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
Toni Gainey
Defendant:
Florence One Schools District and Superintendent Richard O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. Smith
as 0:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Jackson, Jackie Gainey-Jackson and Damion Gainey
Defendant:
Larry Allen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
