Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Horne v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Christine Horne
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karsten Allen v. T. Norvell
as 24-6541
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant:
T. NORVELL, Sergeant, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. MULLINS, Correctional Officer, Housing Unit B at Keen Mountain Correctional Center, G. V. HORNE, Lieutenant at Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
US v. William Horne, IV
as 24-6534
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY HORNE, IV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Horne v. Monahan's Pub
as 1:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Gregory Horne
Defendant:
Monahan's Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Horne v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02065
Petitioner:
Calvin Lee Horne
Respondent:
Decretary T. Ishee and Secretary T. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormick v. Horn et al
as 7:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Mack Earnest Horn and Deputy Hagy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hamlin v. Horn et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hamlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Horn, Mercer County Commission, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. SMR MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00933
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., MOTHER MAY I MUSIC, ECHO ECHO TUNES and others
Defendant:
SMR MANAGEMENT, LLC doing business as RODY'S TAVERN, BARBARA RODERMOND and STEPHEN MICHAEL RODERMOND
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
