Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reid v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Admin Est Delisa Hernandez Reid
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Nurse Delisa Jordan, Nurse Merian Kamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamara v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv04621
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
Sentator Tim Scott and The Team Scott Campaign
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamara v. Obama et al
as 2:2023cv04468
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
44 U.S. President Barrack Obama, 46 U.S. President Joseph Biden and Democrat Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kamara v. American Bar Association et al
as 2:2023cv04356
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
American Bar Association, State of South Carolina, Charleston City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982 Civil Rights Racial Discrimination
v. Kamara et al
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
Charleston School of Law, Ed Bell, Nicholas Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kamara v. Jaddou et al
as 8:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Ramatu Kamara
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Antonio Donis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Obataiye-Allah v. Faust et al
as 5:2022ct03079
Plaintiff:
Uhuru Obataiye-Allah and Uhuru'Sekou Kamara Ajani Obataiye-Allah
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Faust, Denise Jackson, V. Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamara et al v. Aldi Inc. (MARYLAND)
as 8:2021cv01005
Defendant:
ALDI INC. (MARYLAND)
Plaintiff:
Aminata Kamara and Lamin Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kamara v. Warden
as 5:2021cv00201
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Kamara Ahmed and Ahmed Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
