Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 444
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff: Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant: Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Diana Mey v. William Pintas
as 24-1494
Plaintiff: DIANA MEY, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated
Defendant: WILLIAM PINTAS, P&M LAW FIRM, LLC, P&M LAW FIRM (PR), LLC and others
Clark v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: John R. Clark
Defendant: State of North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Chavies v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners, Baltimore City Schools, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01543
Defendant: The KSC Law Firm, Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners, Baltimore City Schools, Maryland, The Baltimore Teachers Union and others
Plaintiff: Nicole L. Chavies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson v. John Doe-Esurance Property & Casualty Claim #NJS-010-4277 & #186235605 et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Kenneth B. Nelson
Defendant: John Doe-Esurance Property & Casualty Claim #NJS-010-4277 & #186235605, Tina N. Cavender Claim #PAW006922607,, Lewis and Keller-Law Firm John Doe/Jane Doe, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Nelums et al v. Hutchens Law Firm, LLP et al
as 3:2024cv02427
Plaintiff: John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums
Defendant: Hutchens Law Firm, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation, Cascade Funding Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Diana Mey
Defendant: William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davis v. Smith and Robinson Law Firm et al
as 0:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: LaQuinces D. Davis
Defendant: Smith and Robinson Law Firm, South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund and S.C. Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant: Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?