Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dallas Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Eric Woodhouse, Fredrick McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Woodhouse and Terri Lynne Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Racheal Cunningham, Fredrick Mcpherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2018ct03299
Defendant:
Captain Richardson, Racheal Eley, Mr. Sledge and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. McMahon et al
as 5:2018ct03184
Defendant:
Ed McMahon, Keaton West and Nurse Racheal
Plaintiff:
Preante Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Steigen et al
as 1:2017cv03842
Plaintiff:
Latoya Gray
Defendant:
Racheal Steigen and John Doe Officers 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. City Of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv03478
Plaintiff:
Latoya Gray
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore, P.O. Racheal Steigen, John Doe Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parks v. Parks Auto Parts Inc
as 2:2015cv02947
Plaintiff:
Racheal Parks
Defendant:
Parks Auto Parts Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hinzman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26863
Plaintiff:
Racheal Ann Hinzman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emma Frields et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02290
Plaintiff:
Emma Frields , Abisac Clark , Gwendolyn Clark and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
