Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gregory v. State of South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv02316
Plaintiff: Clarence Silvester Gregory
Defendant: State of South Carolina Department of Corrections, Former SCDC Employees, Staffs and Officers, Martyna Tanaisha Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2027
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00592
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Spell v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00722
Defendant: Nate Nuty, Deon Wright, Nate Duty and others
Plaintiff: Julius L. Spell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11756
Plaintiff: Sharon Johnson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv10461
Plaintiff: Sharon Johnson
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02395
Plaintiff: Sharon Johnson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00497
Plaintiff: Sharon Johnson and Donald Downey
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21271
Plaintiff: Sharon Johnson
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Candacy Roberts-Anderson et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02355
Plaintiff: Candacy Roberts-Anderson , Cheryl Faulkner , Rose Flores and others
Defendant: Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?