Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Dingle v. Baggett et al
as 5:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Brenda Englis, Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Joseph A. Bledsoe, III and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Trevor Mohammed v. Dennis Daniel
as 16-7364
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TREVOR MOHAMMED
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS DANIELS, WHITNEY DRIVER, JOHN A. HERRING and others
Defendant:
DONALD MICKLOS
Alonzo Greene v. Bobby Marshall
as 15-7317
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALONZO GREENE
Respondent - Appellee:
BOBBY W. MARSHALL
Ricardo Gonzalez-Castro v. Bob Marshall
as 15-6462
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO ABRAHAM GONZALEZ-CASTRO
Respondent - Appellee:
BOB W. MARSHALL and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Lynch et al v. Dining Concepts Group LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00580
Defendant:
Dining Concepts Group LLC, Sandeep Patel, John Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Lynch, John Michael Jones, Brittany Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alberto Cruz v. Bob Marshall
as 15-6130
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERTO MARQUEZ CRUZ
Respondent - Appellee:
BOB W. MARSHALL and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
GONZALEZ-CASTRO v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2013cv01120
Petitioner:
RICARDO ABRAHAM GONZALEZ-CASTRO
Respondent:
BOB W. MARSHALL and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRUZ v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2013cv01097
Petitioner:
ALBERTO MARQUEZ CRUZ
Respondent:
BOB W. MARSHALL and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
