Cases 1 - 10 of 2,358
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker Washington, Jr. v. Warden Kelly
as 24-6514
Plaintiff:
WALKER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, Individual Capacity, CAPTAIN CHASE, Individual Capacity, LIEUTENANT ALLEN, (S.E.S.) (S.I.S.), Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-employment Rights Act - USERRA
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Canas et al
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Defendant:
Officer Canas and Lt. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Officer Chan et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walker
Defendant:
Officer Chan and Lt. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moaf et al v. Casey et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Mohsen Moaf and Jacqueline A Moaf
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Dan Gordon, Robert Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fraser v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Wilmot A. Fraser
Defendant:
City of Charleston, William S. Cogswell, Jr. and Chito Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truist Bank et al v. Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Truist Bank and Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Housing and Urban Development, Valarie D. Walker, Midland Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
