Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Wartak v. CBC Operations Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Seth Wartak
Defendant:
CBC Operations Group, LLC doing business as Cold Bore Capital, Sergio Zepeda, Matthew Schachman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Luis Cubias Zepeda v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1383
Petitioner:
LUIS ERNESTO CUBIAS ZEPEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Wartak v. CBC Operations Group LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Seth Wartak
Defendant:
CBC Operations Group LLC doing business as Cold Bore Capital, Sergio Zepeda, Matthew Schachman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zepeda-Eufracio v. Maruka
as 1:2020cv00436
Petitioner:
Pedro Daniel Zepeda-Eufracio
Respondent:
C. Maruka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zepeda Cordova et al v. Sam's Mart, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00538
Defendant:
Sam's Mart, LLC, Sam's Mart II, LLC, Sami I Nafisi and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Montano Lopez and Emilio Zepeda Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carmen Zepeda Galvez v. William Barr
as 19-1939
Petitioner:
CARMEN LIZETH ZEPEDA GALVEZ and TANIA IXEL DE LA O ZEPEDA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Nouri et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100 and Marriott International Inc
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Zepeda and Cina Nouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ramos et al v. Stone Forestry Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv02942
Plaintiff:
Jose H Ruiz Ramos and Francisco Zepeda Ramos
Defendant:
Randy Stone and Stone Forestry Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyd v. Holmes et al
as 5:2018ct03277
Defendant:
Mr. McClawhorn, Mr. Thompson, D. Zepeda and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Lamar Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zepeda-Toscano v. United States
as 5:2018hc02129
Petitioner:
Alvaro Zepeda-Toscano
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
