Cases 51 - 60 of 827,907
Sasson v. Shmuts et al
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner:
Motty Sasson
Respondent:
Tatyana Shmuts, Diana Gorodischer and Yan Gorodetsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. The Home Depot
as 2:2024cv11379
Plaintiff:
Samuel Guy
Defendant:
The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Shadek v. Kidd
as 6:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
James M Shadek
Defendant:
Tamara S Kidd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Randall Construction Holdings, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
RANDALL CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS, INC., Randall Mechanical, Inc., 3207 Clarcona, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sanchez v. A & J Ready Mix Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sanchez
Defendant:
A & J Ready Mix Inc. and Juan J. Bentancor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jermine v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Corrine Jermine
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lovings v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Defendant:
Harris County Jail S Ed Gonzalez, R Savage and Mr. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Orange County of Florida et al
as 6:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Orange County of Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
