Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Moore v. Sanders et al
as 5:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Travis Patten, Lillie Blackmon Sanders, Walter Armstrong and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Mills v. Adams Cty Bd of Supr, et al
as 20-60304
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER MINGEE, DELAYNE BUSH, LEE BEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY DUANE MILLS
Anthony Mills v. Adams County Mississippi, et al
as 19-60829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY DUANE MILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS PATTEN and ADAMS COUNTY MISSISSIPPI
Anthony Mills v. Adams County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 19-60751
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY FRANK, IV, MATTHEW HENDERSON, JACKIE DENNIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY DUANE MILLS
McCoy v. Guido et al
as 5:2019cv00064
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Stephen Guido, Adams County Sheriff Travis Patten and others
Plaintiff:
Triand McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patten v. Tracie McCormick, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Tracie McCormick, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Patten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Texas Woman's University et al
as 4:2019cv00409
Defendant:
Texas Woman's University, William Patten, Rob Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
D'Andre F Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Smith v. Adams County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Travis Patten, Wayne Rabb and Adams County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Dustin A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Sheriff Travis Patten and Jail Administrator Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Nichols et al
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Travis Patten and Tony Nichols
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
