Cases 131 - 140 of 827,778
Sims v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02831
Plaintiff:
Reginald Sims
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tapia v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Israel Tapia
Defendant:
Marcus Anderson and Iliana S Magallane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Owens
as 7:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jahkeem Wesley Jones
Defendant:
R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, Hon. James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparrow v. Gymfinn, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Paige Sparrow
Defendant:
Gymfinn, Inc. d/b/a Apollo School of Gymnastics, Jessica R. Dubberly, Lourdes Benvavides and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
S. K.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
