Cases 121 - 130 of 831,391
Singh, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3858
Petitioner:
DAYA SINGH, KIRATPAL KAUR KAUR and RANJEET SINGH SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fan v. City of Newport Beach, et al.
as 24-3866
Plaintiff:
YAXIAN FAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, in the City of Santa Ana and KEITH E RODEHUIS, KER is the owner of KER Legal Group
(PC) Gaither v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Burrell A. Gaither
Defendant:
S. Williams, A. George, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey #367587 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Terrence Louis Lindsey
Defendant:
Avery Lee, D Martinez, I Eggleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Debter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Clayton Realty Company, LLC v. KKM Diagnostic Imaging Group, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Clayton Realty Company, LLC
Defendant:
KKM Diagnostic Imaging Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thurmond v. Marlin Mortgage Capital, LLC
as 2:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Edwan S. Thurmond
Defendant:
Marlin Mortgage Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kyndberg v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2024cv07193
Not Yet Classified:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Kendra Kyndberg
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Monlux v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
3M Company, AECOM Energy & Construction Inc, ALTEN Technology USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Monlux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
