Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Ponder v. Wild
as 2:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Hans-Peter Wild
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speerly et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2019cv11044
Plaintiff:
Darrin Degrand, Wesley Won, Joseph Sierchio and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Keith Fenske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ponder v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 6:2018cv00221
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Ponder
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
v. PONDER et al
as 2:2017cv12951
Defendant:
CITY OF GARDEN CITY, Burger Schools for Autism Garden City School District and Garden City Public Schools
Plaintiff:
RAY L PONDER and DONNA PONDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv01152
Plaintiff:
Samantha Ponder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Percival #220239 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Leon Percival #220239, Diego Galvan #652344, Rason Horton #361861 and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, David Isard, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damian Orlowski, et al v. Larry Bates, et al
as 15-5959
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAMIAN ORLOWSKI, LYNN CECHIN, ORRIN CONKLIN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY C. BATES, Individually and BARBARA B. BATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turner et al v. Howe et al
as 1:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Hannah Turner and L T
Defendant:
Charles Michael Howe, Grandview Medical Center , Ponder Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferguson v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Angela Ponder Ferguson
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
