Cases 31 - 40 of 139
Gonzalez v. Zenoff et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant:
McLaren, Hutchinson, Robert J. Mangan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corrie Wallace, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 21-1883
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERY HUTCHINSON, Warden, ROB JEFFREYS, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFAEL E. SANTOS, JR. and CORRIE WALLACE
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, RUDOLPH, UNKNOWN OFFICERS WORKING 2-D THIS DATE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARRIS LEWIS, STEPHEN HUTCHINSON, JAMES GRIFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Vidal et al
as 3:2021cv50149
Defendant:
J. J., Thomas A. Lilien, Joseph McGraw and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHISON v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv00682
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
RONALD HUTCHINSON and RONALD HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutchinson v. Radtke
as 2:2020cv01830
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Petitioner:
Terrance M Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edelson PC v. Girardi et al
as 1:2020cv07115
Defendant:
Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP, John Doe 1-10, Johnston Hutchinson & Lira LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Edelson PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hutchinson v. Kelling et al
as 2:2020cv01264
Defendant:
Esserlaw LLC, American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc, Oakton Avenue Law Offices SC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jamey Jackson v. Dennis Devalkenaere, et al
as 19-2942
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS RUTHERFORD, ERIK GULBRANDSON, SCOTT SCHMITZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEY JACKSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
