Cases 111 - 120 of 829,624
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Selene Finance LP v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv02509
Plaintiff:
Selene Finance LP and Ras Crane & Partners, PLLC
Defendant:
Camau Green and Beverly Boothe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Nesbit et al
as 1:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
Kenny A. Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Osborn Nesbit and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Lankford v. McCombs et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Officer McCombs, Sergeant Doe and Newport News Jail Magistrate Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Lankford v. Schraudt et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Derek Lankford
Defendant:
Jennifer Schraudt and Newport News Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Novick v. Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Martin Stanley Novick
Defendant:
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Woodward v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05442
Petitioner:
Robert Lucas Woodward
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Orkin v. Albert, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ORKIN and ARTHUR ORKIN
Defendant:
LISA SUE ALBERT and IAN ALBERT
Cross Plaintiff:
BOOST WEB SEO, INC.
Interested Party:
CARDCONNECT, LLC
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
US v. Alan Richardson
as 24-6551
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALAN RANDALL RICHARDSON, a/k/a Monkey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
